https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402545 The HC dismissed the writ petition, upholding the validity of the impugned order dated 20.08.2020 authorizing reassessment under Section 29(7) of the U.P. VAT Act, 2008. The court distinguished the case from Catalysts vs. State of U.P. and aligned with the Full Bench judgment in Commissioner of Sales Tax vs. Jag Mohan Nath, affirming the legality of the reassessment proceedings. The petitioner's non-appearance and objections were deemed unsubstantial, and the impugned order was affirmed. en-us Tue, 15 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Oct 2024 15:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402545 The HC dismissed the writ petition, upholding the validity of the impugned order dated 20.08.2020 authorizing reassessment under Section 29(7) of the U.P. VAT Act, 2008. The court distinguished the case from Catalysts vs. State of U.P. and aligned with the Full Bench judgment in Commissioner of Sales Tax vs. Jag Mohan Nath, affirming the legality of the reassessment proceedings. The petitioner's non-appearance and objections were deemed unsubstantial, and the impugned order was affirmed. Case-Laws VAT / Sales Tax Tue, 15 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402545