https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292735 The High Court of Madras allowed the petition, holding that the complaint for obstructing a public servant in executing a decree should have been filed by an authorized person such as the amin, Nazir, Subordinate Judge, or their superiors, not the District Munsiff. The Sub-Magistrate was directed to return the complaint for proper filing by an authorized person. en-us Wed, 19 Aug 1942 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Jan 2021 13:01:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292735 The High Court of Madras allowed the petition, holding that the complaint for obstructing a public servant in executing a decree should have been filed by an authorized person such as the amin, Nazir, Subordinate Judge, or their superiors, not the District Munsiff. The Sub-Magistrate was directed to return the complaint for proper filing by an authorized person. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 19 Aug 1942 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292735