https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402542 The Court set aside the orders declaring property forfeiture and demanding surrender under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The Competent Authority's jurisdictional error in failing to consider exclusion and past legal opinions led to the ruling in favor of the petitioner. The Court annulled the orders without requiring the petitioner to exhaust statutory appeal remedies, given the undisputed facts and the Competent Authority's error. As a result, the impugned orders were overturned, and the petition was allowed in favor of the petitioner. en-us Wed, 16 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Jan 2021 12:46:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402542 The Court set aside the orders declaring property forfeiture and demanding surrender under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The Competent Authority's jurisdictional error in failing to consider exclusion and past legal opinions led to the ruling in favor of the petitioner. The Court annulled the orders without requiring the petitioner to exhaust statutory appeal remedies, given the undisputed facts and the Competent Authority's error. As a result, the impugned orders were overturned, and the petition was allowed in favor of the petitioner. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 16 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402542