<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 133 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402541</link>
    <description>An offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act may be compounded even after conviction, where the parties record a compromise and the cheque liability is fully satisfied. On that basis, the dispute ceased to survive for adjudication, and the conviction and sentence were quashed. The accused was consequently acquitted of the cheque dishonour charge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2021 12:46:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=632227" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 133 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402541</link>
      <description>An offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act may be compounded even after conviction, where the parties record a compromise and the cheque liability is fully satisfied. On that basis, the dispute ceased to survive for adjudication, and the conviction and sentence were quashed. The accused was consequently acquitted of the cheque dishonour charge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402541</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>