<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1950 (12) TMI 35 - Calcutta High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292726</link>
    <description>Section 4(1) of the Payment of Taxes (Transfer of Property) Act, 1949 was held not to authorise notices in respect of leases, because the provision formed part of a statutory scheme tied to transfers requiring registration under Section 17 of the Registration Act. Leases outside that registration framework did not fall within the section&#039;s scope, and the notices were therefore without authority. Section 9 was treated as a saving provision preserving proceedings initiated under the earlier Ordinance through Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, but it did not expand the substantive reach of the later Act or validate unauthorised notices. The notices were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 1950 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2021 11:11:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=632217" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1950 (12) TMI 35 - Calcutta High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292726</link>
      <description>Section 4(1) of the Payment of Taxes (Transfer of Property) Act, 1949 was held not to authorise notices in respect of leases, because the provision formed part of a statutory scheme tied to transfers requiring registration under Section 17 of the Registration Act. Leases outside that registration framework did not fall within the section&#039;s scope, and the notices were therefore without authority. Section 9 was treated as a saving provision preserving proceedings initiated under the earlier Ordinance through Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, but it did not expand the substantive reach of the later Act or validate unauthorised notices. The notices were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 1950 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292726</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>