<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1940 (9) TMI 28 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292725</link>
    <description>Amounts realised from rent collections during a mortgage transaction were taxable in the mortgagee&#039;s hands because they were received not as owner or usufructuary mortgagee, but in reduction of the secured debt; the Rs. 42,000 therefore lost any agricultural income character and was not exempt. The Court also held that the profit from the mortgage transaction, apart from the earlier receipt of Rs. 84,700, accrued only when the transaction was finally closed and title litigation ended, so it was assessable in the year of account. Both issues were decided against the assessee and the assessment was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 1940 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2021 10:39:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=632216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1940 (9) TMI 28 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292725</link>
      <description>Amounts realised from rent collections during a mortgage transaction were taxable in the mortgagee&#039;s hands because they were received not as owner or usufructuary mortgagee, but in reduction of the secured debt; the Rs. 42,000 therefore lost any agricultural income character and was not exempt. The Court also held that the profit from the mortgage transaction, apart from the earlier receipt of Rs. 84,700, accrued only when the transaction was finally closed and title litigation ended, so it was assessable in the year of account. Both issues were decided against the assessee and the assessment was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 1940 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292725</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>