https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292721 The court resolved all issues in favor of the appellant. The remittance of the write-off of bad debts related to urban branches, the claim for deduction under Section 36(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act, the determination of expenditure disallowable under Section 14A, and the question of disallowance under Section 14A were all decided in favor of the appellant based on relevant legal precedents. Although the decision on Minimum Alternate Tax liability was not explicitly mentioned, it can be inferred that it was likely resolved in favor of the appellant as well. en-us Fri, 31 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Jan 2021 20:42:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292721 The court resolved all issues in favor of the appellant. The remittance of the write-off of bad debts related to urban branches, the claim for deduction under Section 36(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act, the determination of expenditure disallowable under Section 14A, and the question of disallowance under Section 14A were all decided in favor of the appellant based on relevant legal precedents. Although the decision on Minimum Alternate Tax liability was not explicitly mentioned, it can be inferred that it was likely resolved in favor of the appellant as well. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 31 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292721