<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 957 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI  </title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292722</link>
    <description>The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision, ruling that the replacement of the Interim Resolution Professional by the Committee of Creditors is not justiciable. The Tribunal also affirmed the Committee&#039;s authority in fixing the fee for the Interim Resolution Professional, dismissing the appeal on both issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2021 20:42:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=632204" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 957 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI  </title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292722</link>
      <description>The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision, ruling that the replacement of the Interim Resolution Professional by the Committee of Creditors is not justiciable. The Tribunal also affirmed the Committee&#039;s authority in fixing the fee for the Interim Resolution Professional, dismissing the appeal on both issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292722</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>