<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (11) TMI 30 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24222</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the rental income derived by the assessee from leasing out a part of the factory building constituted business income. Despite the temporary lease, the main part of the factory was still used for business activities, supporting the commercial nature of the lease. Legal precedents and factual considerations favored this classification, leading to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:17:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63220" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (11) TMI 30 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24222</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the rental income derived by the assessee from leasing out a part of the factory building constituted business income. Despite the temporary lease, the main part of the factory was still used for business activities, supporting the commercial nature of the lease. Legal precedents and factual considerations favored this classification, leading to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24222</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>