https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402530 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the estimation of business income by the Assessing Officer but deleting the addition of Rs. 1,07,27,000 as unexplained cash deposits. The Tribunal cited legal precedent and factual examination to support its decision. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned due to the assessee's illness, allowing the appeal to proceed to a hearing. en-us Fri, 16 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Jan 2021 11:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402530 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the estimation of business income by the Assessing Officer but deleting the addition of Rs. 1,07,27,000 as unexplained cash deposits. The Tribunal cited legal precedent and factual examination to support its decision. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned due to the assessee's illness, allowing the appeal to proceed to a hearing. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 16 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402530