<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 108 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , HYDERABAD BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402516</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Application, upholding the RP&#039;s decision to reject the Applicant&#039;s claim, not declare the Applicant as a Financial Creditor, and exclude the Applicant from the CoC. The Tribunal found the transaction suspicious and concluded that the unregistered Assignment Agreement could not be relied upon for admitting the claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2021 10:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=632097" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 108 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , HYDERABAD BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402516</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Application, upholding the RP&#039;s decision to reject the Applicant&#039;s claim, not declare the Applicant as a Financial Creditor, and exclude the Applicant from the CoC. The Tribunal found the transaction suspicious and concluded that the unregistered Assignment Agreement could not be relied upon for admitting the claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402516</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>