<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 1282 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292683</link>
    <description>The appeals were admitted after condoning a delay of 1250 days. An additional ground asserting the land sold was rural agricultural, exempt from capital gains tax, was admitted and remitted for fresh adjudication. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a thorough verification by the Assessing Officer regarding the nature of the land sold. The appeals were partly allowed for statistical purposes, with the Tribunal focusing on ensuring correct assessment of tax liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2021 19:45:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=632083" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 1282 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292683</link>
      <description>The appeals were admitted after condoning a delay of 1250 days. An additional ground asserting the land sold was rural agricultural, exempt from capital gains tax, was admitted and remitted for fresh adjudication. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a thorough verification by the Assessing Officer regarding the nature of the land sold. The appeals were partly allowed for statistical purposes, with the Tribunal focusing on ensuring correct assessment of tax liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292683</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>