<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1912 (4) TMI 3 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292677</link>
    <description>Filing an appeal on the reopening day after vacation was treated as within time under Section 73 of the Indian Insolvency Act, 1848, following the settled view in the cited authorities. A security sum deposited in the firm&#039;s ordinary course of dealing and placed in fixed deposit, with no proof that the depositor objected to that practice, was inferred to have been accepted with the depositor&#039;s assent. On that footing, the deposit gave rise to a debtor-creditor relationship between the firm and the depositor, and the appeal succeeded with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 1912 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2021 16:45:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=632059" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1912 (4) TMI 3 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292677</link>
      <description>Filing an appeal on the reopening day after vacation was treated as within time under Section 73 of the Indian Insolvency Act, 1848, following the settled view in the cited authorities. A security sum deposited in the firm&#039;s ordinary course of dealing and placed in fixed deposit, with no proof that the depositor objected to that practice, was inferred to have been accepted with the depositor&#039;s assent. On that footing, the deposit gave rise to a debtor-creditor relationship between the firm and the depositor, and the appeal succeeded with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 1912 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292677</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>