https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292672 The court held that mortgaging future income from scavenging work was invalid under Indian law, as it constituted an expectancy or possibility. It ruled that the claimed scavenging rights based on custom were not legally recognizable, as they sought to restrain others from legitimate work. The court rejected the claim for a permanent injunction, emphasizing that damages would suffice and that enforcing customs contrary to public good was impermissible. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower court's decision. en-us Fri, 22 Apr 1938 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Jan 2021 15:29:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292672 The court held that mortgaging future income from scavenging work was invalid under Indian law, as it constituted an expectancy or possibility. It ruled that the claimed scavenging rights based on custom were not legally recognizable, as they sought to restrain others from legitimate work. The court rejected the claim for a permanent injunction, emphasizing that damages would suffice and that enforcing customs contrary to public good was impermissible. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower court's decision. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 22 Apr 1938 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292672