<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1929 (12) TMI 8 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292670</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras upheld the trial court&#039;s decision, confirming the existence of the trust, rejecting the breach of trust allegation, and affirming the plaintiff&#039;s preferential claim over the assets of Tawker &amp;amp; Sons. The court ruled that the trust property could be traced into the assets held by the Official Assignee, and the plaintiff was entitled to a charge on those assets. The appeal was dismissed with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 1929 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2021 12:39:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=632027" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1929 (12) TMI 8 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292670</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras upheld the trial court&#039;s decision, confirming the existence of the trust, rejecting the breach of trust allegation, and affirming the plaintiff&#039;s preferential claim over the assets of Tawker &amp;amp; Sons. The court ruled that the trust property could be traced into the assets held by the Official Assignee, and the plaintiff was entitled to a charge on those assets. The appeal was dismissed with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 1929 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>