<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 79 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402487</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the proceedings under section 147 due to the lack of application of mind by the Assessing Officer and the invalid basis for reopening the assessment. The initiation of proceedings under section 147 was found to be flawed as the return of income had been filed within the stipulated time, rendering the entire process invalid. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of the Assessing Officer verifying information before assuming jurisdiction to ensure the validity of the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2021 11:40:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=632006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 79 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402487</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the proceedings under section 147 due to the lack of application of mind by the Assessing Officer and the invalid basis for reopening the assessment. The initiation of proceedings under section 147 was found to be flawed as the return of income had been filed within the stipulated time, rendering the entire process invalid. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of the Assessing Officer verifying information before assuming jurisdiction to ensure the validity of the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402487</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>