https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402477 The court clarified that no statutory provision mandated a report from the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence for provisional release of seized goods under the Customs Act. Emphasizing the need for timely consideration, the court directed the respondents to decide on the petitioner's application within ten days based on merit and in accordance with the law, requiring a speaking order uninfluenced by the court's directive. The judgment highlighted the importance of adherence to legal procedures and unbiased decision-making in such cases, allowing the writ petition and a connected petition arising from the same dispute. en-us Tue, 15 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Jan 2021 11:00:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402477 The court clarified that no statutory provision mandated a report from the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence for provisional release of seized goods under the Customs Act. Emphasizing the need for timely consideration, the court directed the respondents to decide on the petitioner's application within ten days based on merit and in accordance with the law, requiring a speaking order uninfluenced by the court's directive. The judgment highlighted the importance of adherence to legal procedures and unbiased decision-making in such cases, allowing the writ petition and a connected petition arising from the same dispute. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 15 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402477