<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 67 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402475</link>
    <description>Insurance proceeds for damaged attached stock were treated as adjustable against crystallised liability under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy) Dispute Resolution Scheme, 2019, where the amount was sufficient to discharge the central excise dues. A refusal to permit adjustment merely because payment had to move through a separate accounting head was described as hyper-technical and inconsistent with the scheme&#039;s purpose of closing legacy disputes. The insurance company had already issued the discharge voucher before the last date, and the delay in receipt of funds was linked to the departmental refusal to allow adjustment. The surplus was directed to be applied towards central GST dues, with any remaining balance refunded to the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2021 10:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=631989" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 67 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402475</link>
      <description>Insurance proceeds for damaged attached stock were treated as adjustable against crystallised liability under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy) Dispute Resolution Scheme, 2019, where the amount was sufficient to discharge the central excise dues. A refusal to permit adjustment merely because payment had to move through a separate accounting head was described as hyper-technical and inconsistent with the scheme&#039;s purpose of closing legacy disputes. The insurance company had already issued the discharge voucher before the last date, and the delay in receipt of funds was linked to the departmental refusal to allow adjustment. The surplus was directed to be applied towards central GST dues, with any remaining balance refunded to the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402475</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>