https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292660 The Court of Appeal dismissed the maintenance claim by the son of an adopted son of the late Rajah of Pittapur against the present Raja, ruling that in an impartible zamindari, the Plaintiff lacked the legal basis for the claim as coparcenary rights do not exist in such properties. The judgment emphasized the necessity of a valid legal basis or established customary right for maintenance claims in impartible zamindaris, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the appeal with costs. en-us Thu, 02 May 1918 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Jan 2021 10:30:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292660 The Court of Appeal dismissed the maintenance claim by the son of an adopted son of the late Rajah of Pittapur against the present Raja, ruling that in an impartible zamindari, the Plaintiff lacked the legal basis for the claim as coparcenary rights do not exist in such properties. The judgment emphasized the necessity of a valid legal basis or established customary right for maintenance claims in impartible zamindaris, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the appeal with costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 02 May 1918 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292660