<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 64 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402472</link>
    <description>Reassessment under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act was held barred by limitation because the revision notice was issued beyond the five-year period prescribed for escaped turnover assessments from the date of the final assessment order. The challenge was treated as jurisdictional, so the availability of a statutory appeal did not prevent writ relief. The impugned revision assessment order was set aside on limitation grounds, and the alternate-remedy objection was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2021 09:46:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=631978" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 64 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402472</link>
      <description>Reassessment under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act was held barred by limitation because the revision notice was issued beyond the five-year period prescribed for escaped turnover assessments from the date of the final assessment order. The challenge was treated as jurisdictional, so the availability of a statutory appeal did not prevent writ relief. The impugned revision assessment order was set aside on limitation grounds, and the alternate-remedy objection was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>