https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292640 A grove was treated as self-acquired property where the evidence rebutted any weak presumption of joint family ownership, including separate residence, treatment of the property as personal property, a will consistent with separate ownership, and planting on land received by the deceased owner. Possession by a widow was lawful and not adverse, while the daughter-in-law could not perfect title by adverse possession because the relevant period after the widow's death was too short. Protection for a transferee from an ostensible owner under Section 41 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, required proof of the real owner's consent and reasonable care in verifying title; mutation or revenue entries alone were insufficient. en-us Fri, 25 Jan 1929 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Jan 2021 12:14:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292640 A grove was treated as self-acquired property where the evidence rebutted any weak presumption of joint family ownership, including separate residence, treatment of the property as personal property, a will consistent with separate ownership, and planting on land received by the deceased owner. Possession by a widow was lawful and not adverse, while the daughter-in-law could not perfect title by adverse possession because the relevant period after the widow's death was too short. Protection for a transferee from an ostensible owner under Section 41 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, required proof of the real owner's consent and reasonable care in verifying title; mutation or revenue entries alone were insufficient. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 25 Jan 1929 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292640