https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292633 A suit for ejectment was maintainable where the plaintiffs derived their right from predecessors who had held the rents and profits of the shop; their ability to sue did not depend on proving mutawalli status, especially when the defendants were not shown to be mutawallis. The Court also treated religious objects connected with a public mosque as capable of amounting to charitable purposes under Act XXI of 1860, holding that charity is not confined to alms or direct relief. On that basis, a society formed to secure and manage mosque property for a public mosque was validly registered as a charitable society, and the plaintiffs' decree was restored with costs. en-us Thu, 25 Jan 1906 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Jan 2021 11:00:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292633 A suit for ejectment was maintainable where the plaintiffs derived their right from predecessors who had held the rents and profits of the shop; their ability to sue did not depend on proving mutawalli status, especially when the defendants were not shown to be mutawallis. The Court also treated religious objects connected with a public mosque as capable of amounting to charitable purposes under Act XXI of 1860, holding that charity is not confined to alms or direct relief. On that basis, a society formed to secure and manage mosque property for a public mosque was validly registered as a charitable society, and the plaintiffs' decree was restored with costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 25 Jan 1906 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292633