https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292630 Civil court jurisdiction remains open where the settlement authorities have not actually and finally decided the disputed entry in the Record of Rights. Section 11 of Regulation 3 of 1875 bars suits only for matters already adjudicated by a Settlement Court, and the force of a decree attaches only to decisions or orders made under the Regulation. Section 25-A operates as an enabling provision for contest by specified persons and does not widen the jurisdictional bar. Because the Settlement Officer and the Commissioner declined to determine the plaintiffs' claim as mutwallis, there was no decided matter to exclude civil jurisdiction, including on the issue concerning Tauji No. 111. en-us Tue, 14 Aug 1934 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Jan 2021 10:18:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292630 Civil court jurisdiction remains open where the settlement authorities have not actually and finally decided the disputed entry in the Record of Rights. Section 11 of Regulation 3 of 1875 bars suits only for matters already adjudicated by a Settlement Court, and the force of a decree attaches only to decisions or orders made under the Regulation. Section 25-A operates as an enabling provision for contest by specified persons and does not widen the jurisdictional bar. Because the Settlement Officer and the Commissioner declined to determine the plaintiffs' claim as mutwallis, there was no decided matter to exclude civil jurisdiction, including on the issue concerning Tauji No. 111. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 14 Aug 1934 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292630