<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 631 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292619</link>
    <description>In eviction proceedings based on bona fide personal requirement, subsequent events that materially affect the continued existence of that need must be considered at final adjudication. The Supreme Court stated that although rights are generally tested at the date of commencement, a court may and, where necessary, must take account of later events that affect the relief or enable complete justice. It further noted that Section 21(7) contemplated continuation of the release proceeding by the landlords&#039; legal representatives on the basis of their own need after the landlords&#039; death. The High Court therefore erred in ignoring the deaths of both landlords and in failing to re-examine the matter under the changed circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2021 18:28:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=631869" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 631 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292619</link>
      <description>In eviction proceedings based on bona fide personal requirement, subsequent events that materially affect the continued existence of that need must be considered at final adjudication. The Supreme Court stated that although rights are generally tested at the date of commencement, a court may and, where necessary, must take account of later events that affect the relief or enable complete justice. It further noted that Section 21(7) contemplated continuation of the release proceeding by the landlords&#039; legal representatives on the basis of their own need after the landlords&#039; death. The High Court therefore erred in ignoring the deaths of both landlords and in failing to re-examine the matter under the changed circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>