https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292618 Selection of a retail outlet dealer was governed by the policy circular in force on the interview date, so later brochure requirements could not apply retrospectively. The material showed no reliable proof that the supplementary lease deed or comparable land-capability documents were properly before the selection committee, and marks awarded on that basis were therefore inconsistent with the applicable criteria. The text also notes that, despite this irregularity, the Court declined to interfere under Article 136 because the dealership had been operating for years, substantial investment had been made, and wider public-interest and equitable considerations favoured preserving the final relief granted. en-us Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Jan 2021 18:16:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292618 Selection of a retail outlet dealer was governed by the policy circular in force on the interview date, so later brochure requirements could not apply retrospectively. The material showed no reliable proof that the supplementary lease deed or comparable land-capability documents were properly before the selection committee, and marks awarded on that basis were therefore inconsistent with the applicable criteria. The text also notes that, despite this irregularity, the Court declined to interfere under Article 136 because the dealership had been operating for years, substantial investment had been made, and wider public-interest and equitable considerations favoured preserving the final relief granted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292618