<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1927 (8) TMI 2 - HIGH COURT OF RANGOON</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292606</link>
    <description>A civil suit to recover income tax collected under an assessment is barred where the assessment was made within the statutory machinery and the taxpayer did not use the Act&#039;s objection, appeal, revision, or reference remedies. A mere error in describing the assessee or in making the assessment does not, by itself, make the assessment ultra vires; the material distinction is between an erroneous assessment and a jurisdictional excess. The statutory bar was also not shown to be ultra vires, as no sufficient basis was established to invalidate it on the ground that a similar suit would have lain against the former sovereign. The remedy lies first within the statutory appellate and revisional framework.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 1927 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2021 11:55:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=631845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1927 (8) TMI 2 - HIGH COURT OF RANGOON</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292606</link>
      <description>A civil suit to recover income tax collected under an assessment is barred where the assessment was made within the statutory machinery and the taxpayer did not use the Act&#039;s objection, appeal, revision, or reference remedies. A mere error in describing the assessee or in making the assessment does not, by itself, make the assessment ultra vires; the material distinction is between an erroneous assessment and a jurisdictional excess. The statutory bar was also not shown to be ultra vires, as no sufficient basis was established to invalidate it on the ground that a similar suit would have lain against the former sovereign. The remedy lies first within the statutory appellate and revisional framework.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 1927 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292606</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>