<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 29 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402437</link>
    <description>The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was justified in deleting the addition made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, as the assessee successfully proved the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the loan transactions. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to admit additional evidences, dismissing the revenue&#039;s contention. Consequently, the appeal filed by the revenue was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2021 10:37:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=631830" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 29 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402437</link>
      <description>The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was justified in deleting the addition made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, as the assessee successfully proved the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the loan transactions. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to admit additional evidences, dismissing the revenue&#039;s contention. Consequently, the appeal filed by the revenue was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402437</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>