<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 22 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402430</link>
    <description>The appellate court set aside the Trial Judge&#039;s acquittal of the accused due to failure to consider the statutory presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused was convicted under Section 138 and ordered to pay a fine of Rs. 8,00,000/- to the complainant within eight weeks. Failure to pay would result in one year of simple imprisonment, with the trial court directed to secure the accused if necessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2021 10:19:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=631813" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 22 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402430</link>
      <description>The appellate court set aside the Trial Judge&#039;s acquittal of the accused due to failure to consider the statutory presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused was convicted under Section 138 and ordered to pay a fine of Rs. 8,00,000/- to the complainant within eight weeks. Failure to pay would result in one year of simple imprisonment, with the trial court directed to secure the accused if necessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402430</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>