<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 20 - TRIPURA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402428</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the challenge to the unpaid sales tax demand order, rejecting claims of lack of notice and hearing. The petitioner, directed to file an Appeal within four weeks, received protection from coercive recovery until the appeal&#039;s resolution. The Court allowed the petitioner to raise additional grounds in the Appeal and disposed of the petition and pending applications accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2021 10:19:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=631811" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 20 - TRIPURA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402428</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the challenge to the unpaid sales tax demand order, rejecting claims of lack of notice and hearing. The petitioner, directed to file an Appeal within four weeks, received protection from coercive recovery until the appeal&#039;s resolution. The Court allowed the petitioner to raise additional grounds in the Appeal and disposed of the petition and pending applications accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402428</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>