<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 1188 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402389</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, quashing the PCIT&#039;s order under section 263 for AYs 2014-15 and 2015-16. The tribunal held that the AO&#039;s assessment was not erroneous based on the information available at the time, and subsequent events could not retroactively affect the assessment&#039;s validity. The tribunal also addressed procedural issues, such as condonation of delay and refund of excess appeal fees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2020 20:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=631728" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 1188 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402389</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, quashing the PCIT&#039;s order under section 263 for AYs 2014-15 and 2015-16. The tribunal held that the AO&#039;s assessment was not erroneous based on the information available at the time, and subsequent events could not retroactively affect the assessment&#039;s validity. The tribunal also addressed procedural issues, such as condonation of delay and refund of excess appeal fees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402389</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>