https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402374 A liquidation claim filed after the prescribed last date for submission was held not maintainable. The explanation based on pandemic conditions was rejected, and the objection regarding publication in Ahmedabad editions was found unsustainable because the applicant had a zonal office at Ahmedabad. The underlying agreement also covered an earlier period, supporting the view that the claim was stale and barred by delay. As a result, admission of the claim in liquidation was refused. en-us Wed, 02 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 31 Dec 2020 13:43:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402374 A liquidation claim filed after the prescribed last date for submission was held not maintainable. The explanation based on pandemic conditions was rejected, and the objection regarding publication in Ahmedabad editions was found unsustainable because the applicant had a zonal office at Ahmedabad. The underlying agreement also covered an earlier period, supporting the view that the claim was stale and barred by delay. As a result, admission of the claim in liquidation was refused. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Wed, 02 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402374