<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 1168 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402369</link>
    <description>Assessment orders based on invoice mismatch must follow a fair procedure: the assessee must receive a notice with necessary particulars and a proper opportunity to explain the discrepancy before the matter is finalised. An order passed without that process is unsustainable. At the same time, the assessing officer may proceed afresh in accordance with law, issue a fresh show-cause notice, consider the objections raised, and pass a speaking order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2020 13:32:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=631702" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 1168 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402369</link>
      <description>Assessment orders based on invoice mismatch must follow a fair procedure: the assessee must receive a notice with necessary particulars and a proper opportunity to explain the discrepancy before the matter is finalised. An order passed without that process is unsustainable. At the same time, the assessing officer may proceed afresh in accordance with law, issue a fresh show-cause notice, consider the objections raised, and pass a speaking order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402369</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>