<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (4) TMI 66 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24172</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the rental income received by the directors, who were considered the owners of the building, should not be included in the company&#039;s income for the assessment year 1978-79. The court emphasized the distinction between possession and ownership, stating that the income rightfully belonged to the directors and not the company. The judgment was delivered in favor of the assessee, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 11:37:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63170" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (4) TMI 66 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24172</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the rental income received by the directors, who were considered the owners of the building, should not be included in the company&#039;s income for the assessment year 1978-79. The court emphasized the distinction between possession and ownership, stating that the income rightfully belonged to the directors and not the company. The judgment was delivered in favor of the assessee, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24172</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>