<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1846 - ANDHRA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292578</link>
    <description>Bail in a prosecution for alleged possession of assets disproportionate to known sources of income was considered on the basis that the material disclosed a strong prima facie case of economic misconduct. The court applied a stricter bail approach for a white-collar offence, noting that investigation remained in progress and further inquiry into financial transactions and property dealings was necessary. It treated the risk of interference with investigation and tampering with evidence as substantial. Personal hardship grounds, including medical condition and a son&#039;s proposed marriage, were found insufficient to justify release at that stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2020 13:24:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=631692" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1846 - ANDHRA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292578</link>
      <description>Bail in a prosecution for alleged possession of assets disproportionate to known sources of income was considered on the basis that the material disclosed a strong prima facie case of economic misconduct. The court applied a stricter bail approach for a white-collar offence, noting that investigation remained in progress and further inquiry into financial transactions and property dealings was necessary. It treated the risk of interference with investigation and tampering with evidence as substantial. Personal hardship grounds, including medical condition and a son&#039;s proposed marriage, were found insufficient to justify release at that stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292578</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>