<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1833 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292575</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the classification of the payment for mining lease compensation, stating that no substantial legal questions remained for consideration. The Court noted that previous decisions favored the assessee, and with no interference from higher courts, the matter should be resolved in favor of the assessee. The appeal was disposed of in accordance with existing legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2020 13:24:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=631689" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1833 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292575</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the classification of the payment for mining lease compensation, stating that no substantial legal questions remained for consideration. The Court noted that previous decisions favored the assessee, and with no interference from higher courts, the matter should be resolved in favor of the assessee. The appeal was disposed of in accordance with existing legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>