<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (6) TMI 169 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292560</link>
    <description>A complaint alleging a second marriage, supported by church records, hospital records and proposed witness evidence, was held to disclose a prima facie offence under Section 494 IPC for issuance of process. At the stage of process, the Magistrate examines only whether sufficient grounds exist to proceed; the admissibility, reliability and ultimate proof of the materials are not decided then. The High Court&#039;s inherent power under Section 482 CrPC was not attracted because the complaint did not show absence of essential ingredients, patent absurdity, inherent improbability, capricious exercise of discretion or any fundamental legal defect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2020 10:54:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=631673" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (6) TMI 169 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292560</link>
      <description>A complaint alleging a second marriage, supported by church records, hospital records and proposed witness evidence, was held to disclose a prima facie offence under Section 494 IPC for issuance of process. At the stage of process, the Magistrate examines only whether sufficient grounds exist to proceed; the admissibility, reliability and ultimate proof of the materials are not decided then. The High Court&#039;s inherent power under Section 482 CrPC was not attracted because the complaint did not show absence of essential ingredients, patent absurdity, inherent improbability, capricious exercise of discretion or any fundamental legal defect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292560</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>