<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (12) TMI 68 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24168</link>
    <description>Section 244(1A) was construed as an independent provision granting interest on tax refunds from the date of payment, subject only to exclusion of the one-month period after the appellate or other order. The Court relied on the different language used in section 244(1) to indicate a distinct legislative intent, and held that the construction favourable to the taxpayer should apply where two views are possible. The departmental circular was also treated as consistent with this reading. On that basis, the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation of section 244(1A) was upheld and the Revenue was not entitled to a reference on the proposed question of law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 11:29:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63166" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (12) TMI 68 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24168</link>
      <description>Section 244(1A) was construed as an independent provision granting interest on tax refunds from the date of payment, subject only to exclusion of the one-month period after the appellate or other order. The Court relied on the different language used in section 244(1) to indicate a distinct legislative intent, and held that the construction favourable to the taxpayer should apply where two views are possible. The departmental circular was also treated as consistent with this reading. On that basis, the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation of section 244(1A) was upheld and the Revenue was not entitled to a reference on the proposed question of law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24168</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>