https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292553 Restoration of the Agori Barhar estate was treated as a revival of the ancestral Raj, not the creation of self-acquired property, because the sanad, records, and subsequent treatment showed continuity of the family estate. The impartible character did not destroy joint family status for succession, and the nearest coparcener of the senior line was entitled to the gaddi in the absence of proved separation or contrary custom. The widow's possession was held non-adverse, so limitation did not bar the claim. The malikana was held to follow the estate, while the decree relating to moveables was confined to the specified items. en-us Tue, 30 May 1916 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Dec 2020 15:54:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292553 Restoration of the Agori Barhar estate was treated as a revival of the ancestral Raj, not the creation of self-acquired property, because the sanad, records, and subsequent treatment showed continuity of the family estate. The impartible character did not destroy joint family status for succession, and the nearest coparcener of the senior line was entitled to the gaddi in the absence of proved separation or contrary custom. The widow's possession was held non-adverse, so limitation did not bar the claim. The malikana was held to follow the estate, while the decree relating to moveables was confined to the specified items. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 30 May 1916 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292553