<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 1161 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402362</link>
    <description>The HC of Karnataka upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on all issues, ruling against the revenue and in favor of the assessee. The judgments were based on the interpretation of Section 10A for deduction computation, consistency in treatment across assessment years, and the application of arm&#039;s length pricing principles in international transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2024 11:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=631631" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 1161 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402362</link>
      <description>The HC of Karnataka upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on all issues, ruling against the revenue and in favor of the assessee. The judgments were based on the interpretation of Section 10A for deduction computation, consistency in treatment across assessment years, and the application of arm&#039;s length pricing principles in international transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402362</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>