<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 1158 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402359</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi allowed the appeal of the assessee, setting aside the penalty of ? 83,80,000 imposed under section 271C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The ITAT held that the assessee was not liable to deduct tax at source on External Development Charges paid to Haryana Urban Development Authority as the payment was made through a Government Department and not directly to HUDA. The judgment was pronounced on 29th December 2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2020 21:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=631626" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 1158 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402359</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi allowed the appeal of the assessee, setting aside the penalty of ? 83,80,000 imposed under section 271C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The ITAT held that the assessee was not liable to deduct tax at source on External Development Charges paid to Haryana Urban Development Authority as the payment was made through a Government Department and not directly to HUDA. The judgment was pronounced on 29th December 2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402359</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>