https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402330 Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure permits concurrent anticipatory bail jurisdiction in the High Court and Court of Session, and direct access to the High Court is not barred where special circumstances exist; on the facts discussed, prior connected proceedings and the apprehended arrest justified that approach. In relation to proposed proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, the text states that the challenge based on Section 45 did not prevent anticipatory bail, and that the post-2018 amendment did not revive the twin conditions as urged. The matter was at an investigative stage, the apprehension of arrest was treated as bona fide, and protection against arrest was granted subject to conditions safeguarding investigation. en-us Wed, 16 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Dec 2020 16:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402330 Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure permits concurrent anticipatory bail jurisdiction in the High Court and Court of Session, and direct access to the High Court is not barred where special circumstances exist; on the facts discussed, prior connected proceedings and the apprehended arrest justified that approach. In relation to proposed proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, the text states that the challenge based on Section 45 did not prevent anticipatory bail, and that the post-2018 amendment did not revive the twin conditions as urged. The matter was at an investigative stage, the apprehension of arrest was treated as bona fide, and protection against arrest was granted subject to conditions safeguarding investigation. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 16 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402330