https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402327 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh disposed of two identical Writ Petitions through a Common Order. The Petitioner, a bus service operator, had their application under the Sabkha Vishwas Scheme rejected without detailed reasons. The Respondents claimed the application was based on a bogus letter lacking quantification details. However, upon review, the court found that the service tax liability had been quantified before the deadline, entitling the Petitioner to participate in the Scheme. The rejection order was set aside, and the Respondents were directed to reconsider the application within six weeks. en-us Mon, 21 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Dec 2020 14:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402327 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh disposed of two identical Writ Petitions through a Common Order. The Petitioner, a bus service operator, had their application under the Sabkha Vishwas Scheme rejected without detailed reasons. The Respondents claimed the application was based on a bogus letter lacking quantification details. However, upon review, the court found that the service tax liability had been quantified before the deadline, entitling the Petitioner to participate in the Scheme. The rejection order was set aside, and the Respondents were directed to reconsider the application within six weeks. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 21 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402327