<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1356 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292528</link>
    <description>The court held that the petitioner trust&#039;s activities did not amount to carrying out trade, commerce, or business, and thus, the proviso to Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act did not apply. Consequently, the notice issued under Section 148 for reopening the assessment and the subsequent assessment order were deemed invalid and were quashed. The court allowed the petitions, making the rule absolute with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2020 20:16:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=631564" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1356 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292528</link>
      <description>The court held that the petitioner trust&#039;s activities did not amount to carrying out trade, commerce, or business, and thus, the proviso to Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act did not apply. Consequently, the notice issued under Section 148 for reopening the assessment and the subsequent assessment order were deemed invalid and were quashed. The court allowed the petitions, making the rule absolute with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292528</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>