<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 1112 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402313</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, directing exclusion of PMS-managed investments and consideration of investment value diminution for disallowance under Section 14A with Rule 8D. The addition under Section 94(7) was upheld, dismissing the appeal. The decisions applied mutatis mutandis to subsequent assessment years, partially allowing appeals for those years too.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2020 10:47:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=631535" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 1112 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402313</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, directing exclusion of PMS-managed investments and consideration of investment value diminution for disallowance under Section 14A with Rule 8D. The addition under Section 94(7) was upheld, dismissing the appeal. The decisions applied mutatis mutandis to subsequent assessment years, partially allowing appeals for those years too.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402313</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>