<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 1102 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402303</link>
    <description>Bail was granted in a prosecution under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 because the applicant had cooperated with the investigation for a long period, was never taken into custody during investigation, and was already on bail in the scheduled offence. The Court found no strong, specific allegations justifying continued incarceration, noted that the investigation had continued for several years before the complaint was filed, and observed that the applicant had not misused liberty. The case against him rested substantially on general allegations and limited material, so continued detention was not warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2020 10:04:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=631516" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 1102 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402303</link>
      <description>Bail was granted in a prosecution under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 because the applicant had cooperated with the investigation for a long period, was never taken into custody during investigation, and was already on bail in the scheduled offence. The Court found no strong, specific allegations justifying continued incarceration, noted that the investigation had continued for several years before the complaint was filed, and observed that the applicant had not misused liberty. The case against him rested substantially on general allegations and limited material, so continued detention was not warranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402303</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>