https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402301 The court found the writ application maintainable despite the availability of an alternative remedy under the Central Excise Act due to procedural irregularities and potential discriminatory treatment in the impugned Order in Original. It quashed the order, directing a fresh consideration ensuring compliance with natural justice principles and addressing discrimination issues. The court also instructed a re-examination of relevant circulars and trade notices, with a six-month completion timeline and termination of any recovery proceedings based on the impugned order. en-us Thu, 24 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Mar 2021 10:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402301 The court found the writ application maintainable despite the availability of an alternative remedy under the Central Excise Act due to procedural irregularities and potential discriminatory treatment in the impugned Order in Original. It quashed the order, directing a fresh consideration ensuring compliance with natural justice principles and addressing discrimination issues. The court also instructed a re-examination of relevant circulars and trade notices, with a six-month completion timeline and termination of any recovery proceedings based on the impugned order. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 24 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402301