https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402300 The High Court allowed the petitioner's writ application seeking to quash the order for re-export of goods and directed respondent No.5 to promptly decide on the appeal against the confiscation order. The Court permitted re-export without deposit of redemption fines until the appeal was resolved, instructing respondent No.5 to consider the application within eight days and make a decision within fifteen days. Emphasizing timely decisions, the Court directed respondent No.5 to expedite the appeal process and adhere to circulars for prompt resolution. While the Court did not provide uniform guidelines, it focused on expediting appeals and re-export requests. en-us Tue, 15 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Dec 2020 10:03:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402300 The High Court allowed the petitioner's writ application seeking to quash the order for re-export of goods and directed respondent No.5 to promptly decide on the appeal against the confiscation order. The Court permitted re-export without deposit of redemption fines until the appeal was resolved, instructing respondent No.5 to consider the application within eight days and make a decision within fifteen days. Emphasizing timely decisions, the Court directed respondent No.5 to expedite the appeal process and adhere to circulars for prompt resolution. While the Court did not provide uniform guidelines, it focused on expediting appeals and re-export requests. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 15 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402300