<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 1095 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402296</link>
    <description>Under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, the authorities were not bound to process multiple declarations in chronological order. Where the later declaration matched the duty quantification already reflected in the department&#039;s audit material, it was valid for the designated committee to act on that declaration and treat the earlier inconsistent declaration as redundant. The court found no jurisdictional error, illegality, or denial of hearing in this approach, and the challenge to the treatment of the earlier declaration failed in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2022 10:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=631506" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 1095 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402296</link>
      <description>Under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, the authorities were not bound to process multiple declarations in chronological order. Where the later declaration matched the duty quantification already reflected in the department&#039;s audit material, it was valid for the designated committee to act on that declaration and treat the earlier inconsistent declaration as redundant. The court found no jurisdictional error, illegality, or denial of hearing in this approach, and the challenge to the treatment of the earlier declaration failed in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402296</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>