<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 1089 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , BENGALURU BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402290</link>
    <description>Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 enables restoration of a company struck off from the register where the facts justify revival. On the material recorded, the company had ceased operations and defaulted in filing statutory returns, but there were no pending investigations or complaints, and the Registrar did not oppose restoration. Finding no statutory impediment, the Tribunal treated restoration as in the interests of justice and ease of doing business, subject to compliance with filing obligations and payment of costs. The striking off was reversed and the company&#039;s name was restored to the register on those conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2020 09:58:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=631499" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 1089 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , BENGALURU BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402290</link>
      <description>Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 enables restoration of a company struck off from the register where the facts justify revival. On the material recorded, the company had ceased operations and defaulted in filing statutory returns, but there were no pending investigations or complaints, and the Registrar did not oppose restoration. Finding no statutory impediment, the Tribunal treated restoration as in the interests of justice and ease of doing business, subject to compliance with filing obligations and payment of costs. The striking off was reversed and the company&#039;s name was restored to the register on those conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402290</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>