<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 2155 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292518</link>
    <description>After the invalidation of the twin bail conditions under Section 45(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 and the subsequent amendment, a fresh bail application was maintainable. Applying ordinary bail principles, the Court treated liberty, the accused&#039;s conduct, and the risk of flight or interference with trial as the governing considerations. Bail was granted because the accused had cooperated in investigation, had not been arrested during investigation, no material showed tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses, custody had already continued for a substantial period, and the alleged laundering amount was below one crore rupees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2020 20:57:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=631492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 2155 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292518</link>
      <description>After the invalidation of the twin bail conditions under Section 45(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 and the subsequent amendment, a fresh bail application was maintainable. Applying ordinary bail principles, the Court treated liberty, the accused&#039;s conduct, and the risk of flight or interference with trial as the governing considerations. Bail was granted because the accused had cooperated in investigation, had not been arrested during investigation, no material showed tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses, custody had already continued for a substantial period, and the alleged laundering amount was below one crore rupees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292518</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>